Why you should lodge an FBT return with nil liability

Why you should lodge a FBT return with nil liability | Man in suit standing at desk looking through bundles of paperwork

Even though Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) is designed to capture benefits enjoyed by an employee, it is levied on the employer. Unless your employment agreement allows for any FBT that becomes payable to be recouped from the employee, the employer will have no recourse for reimbursement.

So, why should you lodge an FBT return with nil liability? Well, for the simple reason that it turns on a three-year deadline for the ATO to commence audit activities. To find out the key tax return labels that alert the ATO that an employer may have some FBT exposure, read this article.

Without an FBT return being lodged, the ATO has the discretion to launch an audit into activities as far back as a business has had employees. Without the evidence (e.g. signed declarations, logbooks, meal entertainment records, etc.) that FBT was NOT payable in each year the ATO is likely to raise FBT liabilities, even where the employee who enjoyed the benefit may no longer work for the business. This makes it impossible for the business to recoup anything from the past employee.

Even where an employer believes they have done everything in accordance with legislation, people will make mistakes. A common mistake occurs where an employee is provided with a car and the private use is worked out using the operating cost (logbook) method. A part of using the logbook method is working out deemed depreciation each year and many accountants overlook this or work it out incorrectly by relying on the depreciation claimed on the business’ financial statements. This mistake can give rise to an FBT liability where the calculated employee contribution is insufficient to remove the car’s taxable value. Learn more about car fringe benefits in this article.

If a mistake like this is identified, the ATO is likely to review the entire period that the car was owned by the business. Lodging an FBT return would limit the length of time the ATO can audit to three years.

Another common mistake is not maintaining a register of which employees are the recipient of meal entertainment benefits.

Not all meal entertainment benefits are treated the same which is why maintaining a register is vital.

For example:

You have two employees, Rick & Morty. Rick’s job is to go out and impress current and potential clients at various social events where food and drink is consumed. Morty’s role on the other hand is to remain in the office and complete the projects that Rick wins. At the year-end social function, the food and drink that is consumed by Rick will not qualify as exempt meal entertainment, however, the food and drink consumed by Morty will be exempt. Without the records to confirm who received meal entertainment benefits, and absence of a completed FBT return, the ATO has unlimited scope to audit your records for liabilities.


Further help:

The ATO has signalled that there will be an increased focus on FBT this year, so if you would like to limit the ATO’s ability to retrospectively launch an audit on your business, please contact us. With our expert help, you’ll have peace of mind that you are ticking all the right boxes and avoiding any risk of non-compliance.

You can find out more about working with Marsh & Partners here. As your Absolute.Account.Ability partner we’re on a mission to make your business life better. We’ll help you set goals for your business, devise an Action Plan to make them happen and meet with you regularly to ensure you stay on track.

Share this article on LinkedIn:

GENERAL ADVICE WARNING: This article is general information only and doesn’t constitute specific advice for your business.